Navigation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: | ugg outlet | E-Mail: | lqt0005gmail.com | Homepage: | http://www.uggshopofficial.com | Time: | 12/25/2012 at 1:49pm (UTC) | Message: | We want have the Official Ugg boots low aboard array for soon for they are announced.Our Ugg boots |
Name: | devonrobinson | E-Mail: | devonrobinsonsina.com | Homepage: | http://salemonclerdown.com | Time: | 12/25/2012 at 11:50am (UTC) | Message: |
Staunch U.S. gun rights defenders and gun control advocates show few signs of finding common ground on ways to prevent mass shootings following an armed rampage at a Connecticut elementary school that killed 20 small children and several adults.National tragedies can sometimes force political and ideological opponents to unite for the common good. The United States witnessed such a coming together after the terrorist attacks of 2001. But the mass shooting at Sandy Hook elementary school seems to have done little to bridge differences between ardent defenders of gun rights and those who want to restrict access to firearms. A gun is a tool. The problem is the criminal. Criminals operate outside the <justice> system, he said.Wayne LaPierre, head of the National Rifle Association, America s biggest gun rights lobbying group, spoke Sunday on NBC s Meet the Press program. Friday, LaPierre made headlines when he advocated posting armed guards at every school across the nation.On NBC, he pointedly refused to consider any limits on gun ownership, from restricting access to assault weapons to banning high-capacity ammunition clips. We do not think it <gun>control] works, and we are not going to support it, he said.Democratic Senator Charles Schumer ridiculed gun rights absolutism. Trying to prevent shootings in schools without talking about guns is like trying to prevent lung cancer without talking about cigarettes, he said.Schumer s fellow Democratic Senator Kent Conrad was equally dismissive of LaPierre s suggesting of arming America s schools. It is pretty empty, is it not? That is the only answer? To put more guns in schools? Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Conrad said the cost of putting armed guards in each of America s schools would be prohibitive, and still might not prevent all mass shootings.Gun rights advocates point to the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which proclaims the right of the people to bear arms. America s judiciary has long wrestled over the constitutionality of limiting or restricting that right.Some pro-gun rights legislators have said the Sandy Hook elementary school shootings have caused them to reconsider long-held positions. But Republican Senator John Barrasso says infringing on Second Amendment rights is not the answer. We need real solutions to a significant problem in our country, and I am not sure that passing another law in Washington is going to actually find a real solution, he said. Last week, President Barack Obama said a national dialogue on firearms is long overdue. He appointed Vice President Joe Biden to lead a federal commission on preventing gun violence, but stressed that the American people will have to demand action and remain engaged for change to occur. There are an estimated 200-to-300 million privately-owned firearms in the United States.
|
Name: | devonrobinson | E-Mail: | devonrobinsonsina.com | Homepage: | http://salemonclerdown.com | Time: | 12/23/2012 at 12:16pm (UTC) | Message: |
Comment Sorting Comments by: Jonathan Huang from: canada December 21, 2012 5:51 PM @bejing shots, can't agree with you more.when there was no internet, people dont do business? come on. Report Comment Reason * Please enter the code shown on the image by: beijing shots from: langley December 19, 2012 1:48 AM @BarbaraDemick. hows that not good for China? most "journalists" are spooks anyway. how u gonna spy on them from japan? also, i dont think anyone is begging "businesses" to stay. foreign "businesses" need China, more than China needs them. if you want to move then, dont let the door hit you on the way out. and really, if you want China to be more open to the internet, then stop posting subversive stuff about China. if youre looking for someone to blame, then blame yourselves. but then again, you (military industrial complex) created the internet in order to subvert. so guess you have the choice of either cleaning up your act, or getting your content blocked. i know you (spin doctors) wont be cleaning up your act, so you will just have to live with sending your information through the regular internet, like everyone else. dont think you are anyone special. Report Comment Reason * Please enter the code shown on the image by: Tyrone from: Cambridge MA USA December 16, 2012 8:27 AM If China really blocks VPNs long term, I can see all of the big high tech players (Intel, etc.) leaving. They already put their corporate IP at risk just by being in China. Not being able to have secure network connections to the rest of their world wide facilities means they can't exist in China. Report Comment Reason * Please enter the code shown on the image by: Discover Panda from: Shanghai December 15, 2012 1:52 PM This is outrageously and shocking!!!Big VPN providers are blocked in China. Small providers like seed4.me, etc. work good, but unfortunately most of them work only by invitation. Maybe you will be lucky to get one from their website or ask someone who has it. You are so right when you say that without reliable VPN access, companies in China could have serious problems doing business with the rest of the world. Report Comment Reason * Please enter the code shown on the image
|
Name: | ugg outlet | E-Mail: | lqt0005gmail.com | Homepage: | http://www.professionalugg.com | Time: | 12/23/2012 at 11:22am (UTC) | Message: | Hello, just wanted to say, I enjoyed this post. It was helpful. Keep on posting! |
Name: | ugg outlet | E-Mail: | lqt0005gmail.com | Homepage: | http://www.selectuggs.com | Time: | 12/23/2012 at 12:17am (UTC) | Message: | Looking because Ugg a pair of boots UK inexpensive?Here online moderators is the particular contingency |
Name: | annperez | E-Mail: | annperezsina.com | Homepage: | http://www.downcoatmoncler.com | Time: | 12/21/2012 at 10:52pm (UTC) | Message: |
Lin wa <a href=http://www.downcoatmoncler.com/71-doudoune-moncler-femme-longue>Moncler Enfant Vetement</a> s available for the Lakers to pick but obviously they did not. Even if they drafted him at the time the coach was P Jackson (I believe) whose system was not dependent much on PG anyway. Lin thrived when D'Antoni was his coach and who would know he would be the current Lakers coach to draft Lin then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today, there have been 133 visitors (780 hits) on this page! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|